Let two square mats be placed with one corner of one in contact with one corner of another. It is tempting to surround the in between place for a game, a deity, a yagya or just leave vacant by placing a square mat at PQ.
![]() |
Sitting Space 1 |
The sitting space S provided by the third mat as shown in Figure \ref{sit-1} is not as much as provided by the earlier mats. If we increase the angle \theta in between the two mats we started with, the space S is seen to increase.
![]() |
Sitting Space 2 |
S < A,\ \ S > A.
From the situations S < A, can it suddenly turn to situations S > A?
Must it not pass through the situation S = A?
What is the corresponding value of \theta?
Is it not interesting to experiment that as we increase \theta further, up goes S (above A). Continue the experiment by increasing \theta and observing the increase in S. What is the maximum possible value of \theta, and what is the corresponding value of S, in terms of A?
It is interesting to discover that you cross the situations S > 2A, S > 3A,\, \ldots.
What happens as long as \theta is acute; and what happens when it turns obtuse? Mark the turn from situations S < 2A to S > 2A; can we characterise them in terms of angle \theta (acute and obtuse values of \theta ). In between must be the stage S = 2A. What is \theta then? Formulate your discovery as a theorem.
Let us repeat the experiment with the hands of a clock, attaching stiff paper to hands making them sides of two squares with spaces A and B in between varying angle \theta. Discuss situations for acute and obtuse values of \theta.
Clock hands
Can situations S < A+B suddenly turn to S > A+B? When is S = A+B? Formulate your finding in the form of a theorem. Investigate whether your theorem remains true in case, the sitting mats we start with are semicircular or triangular (equilateral) instead of being square.
No comments:
Post a Comment